For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It’s an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it’s likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading innovation reporter …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there’s a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone’s name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed “solely to bring humour and joy”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It’s also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for surgiteams.com a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, akropolistravel.com authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

“We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really indicate human developers’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It’s works of art. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

“I do not think using generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people’s work without consent must be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be extremely effective but let’s develop it ethically and fairly.”

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers’ material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “insanity”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy,” says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth.”

A federal government spokesperson stated: “No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK government’s brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public data from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, qoocle.com continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under “reasonable usage” and are for pl.velo.wiki that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it’s not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the many downloaded free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American’s present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a “bestseller” I’ll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts since it’s so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I’m unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? here.