Deleting the wiki page 'OpenAI has Little Legal Recourse against DeepSeek, Tech Law Experts Say' cannot be undone. Continue?
1
OpenAI has Little Legal Recourse against DeepSeek, Tech Law Experts Say
Audrea Blank edited this page 5 months ago
OpenAI and the White House have actually implicated DeepSeek of using ChatGPT to cheaply train its brand-new chatbot.
- Experts in tech law say OpenAI has little option under copyright and contract law.
- OpenAI’s regards to use may apply but are mainly unenforceable, they state.
Today, thatswhathappened.wiki OpenAI and the White House implicated DeepSeek of something akin to theft.
In a flurry of press statements, they said the Chinese upstart had bombarded OpenAI’s chatbots with queries and hoovered up the resulting data trove to quickly and cheaply train a model that’s now practically as great.
The Trump administration’s top AI czar stated this training process, called “distilling,” totaled up to copyright theft. OpenAI, surgiteams.com meanwhile, informed Business Insider and securityholes.science other outlets that it’s examining whether “DeepSeek might have wrongly distilled our models.”
OpenAI is not saying whether the company plans to pursue legal action, instead guaranteeing what a spokesperson termed “aggressive, proactive countermeasures to safeguard our innovation.”
But could it? Could it sue DeepSeek on “you took our material” premises, much like the premises OpenAI was itself took legal action against on in a continuous copyright claim filed in 2023 by The New York City Times and other news outlets?
BI postured this question to professionals in technology law, annunciogratis.net who said challenging DeepSeek in the courts would be an uphill battle for [users.atw.hu](http://users.atw.hu/samp-info-forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=1876476766f9fbd5875797713a315c0e&action=profile
Delete Page